Powerful EPA fails to meet deadlines

The Gazette Editorial Board
July 13, 2013

Ninety-eight percent of Environmental Protection Agency regulations for three core Clean Air Act programs were implemented late, according to a new study by William Yeatman of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank.

While delaying EPA regulations may be economically beneficial, the failure to implement them in a timely fashion has encouraged the use of "sue and settle" lawsuits that enable special interests to dictate policy implementation in cahoots with the nonelected bureaucrats of the environmental agency.

Yeatman found that 200 regulations for the three programs have been implemented over the past two decades. However, just four (2 percent) were promulgated within their statutorily defined deadlines. The other 196 were late, by an average of 2,072 days (over five-and-a-half years). The EPA's inability to adhere to congressionally mandated deadlines has opened the door for special interests to dictate policy.

"If the EPA is out of compliance with virtually all of its deadlines," Yeatman said, "then clearly the agency has limited resources relative to its responsibilities. As a result, establishing any deadline determines how the EPA deploys its limited resources, which is no different than rendering policy."

It works like this: Environmental lawyers sue the EPA for not meeting a deadline.

The agency, instead of litigating, then negotiates a settlement of the litigation that establishes a new deadline for implementing the past-due regulation. The result is that certain regulations take precedence over others, depending on who is suing. It is enabled by lawyers for Big Green advocacy groups like the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council colluding with sympathetic bureaucrats to alter regulatory priorities.

Most recently, several environmental groups sued the EPA for not reviewing and revising emission factors for refineries.

The groups could, thanks to sue and settle, force the EPA to change its priorities so that more refineries are likely to be shuttered because of health hazards allegedly linked to global warming.

Read the rest of the article online here. 

Donate Today

The free market is under attack. Help us fight back. Donate today and join our efforts to defend the spirit of innovation, entrepreneurship and idea-making. We need your financial support.

Subscribe on Youtube

youtube-thumb FreeMarketAmerica

Stay up-to-date on our videos
subcribe btn